ArtReach GOAL Youth Workshop Series

Grassroots Organizing and Leadership Toolkits

  • AboutToolkits
  • ToolkitsRead Online
  • MediaVideo Library
  • ResourcesDownloads

Community-Based Participatory Research

>> Download PDF

 




Contributors:


Alpha Abebe

Managing Director
Young Diplomats

Sarah Flicker

Associate Professor
York University, Faculty of Environmental Studies

Purnima George

Assistant Professor
Ryerson University, School of Social Work

Helena Shimeles

Executive Director
Young Diplomats

Amina Yassin

Executive Director
Somali Youth Association of Toronto





Community-Based Participatory Research (CBPR): Breaking it Down
  • Definition of CBPR:

CBPR is a collaborative approach to research that equitably involves all partners in the research process and recognizes the unique strengths that each brings. CBPR begins with a research topic of importance to the community with the aim of combining knowledge and action for social change to improve community health and eliminate health disparities. (Israel et al, 1998, 177)

When we think about research, we sometimes imagine ivory towers, academics behind closed doors, or the lone professor with a magnifying glass. Rarely is research associated with creativity, community activism, or collaboration. Community Based Participatory Research is a research methodology that challenges traditional ways of doing research and exposes critical questions such as:

Who chooses what issues are important or worthy?
Who decides how information should be collected, stored, and shared?
Who benefits from the research process and how?

  • Traditional Research Versus CBPR:
Traditional Research Community Based Participatory Research
Outside Expert Team of Stakeholders
Expert defines what needs to be researched and how Stakeholders collectively decide focus of research
Report may or may not be used to make changes. Early buy-in from stakeholders increases impact
Capacity leaves with expert Capacity is built internally
The goal: knowledge production that is easily generalized to other settings and places. The goal: to respond to the identified needs of a particular community. To combine knowledge with action for change.


  • How Academics May be Similar or Different From Community Members:
Similarities Differences
Academics are people who care
They bring unique skills and experience
They work in complicated and stressful environments
They have productivity quotients
They are often similarly over-worked and under-resourced
They have very specific theoretical jargon
They have different accountability structures and 'bottom lines'
They have different timelines and calendars
They are not usually used to working with communities on a daily basis




  • Who Brings What to the Table:


Communities bring: Researchers bring:
Closer connection to lived experience of community
Unique skills and experience
Experience with strong intersectoral partnerships
Innovative applied research ideas
Understanding of cultural contexts
Access to some funding
Ability to affect grassroots change
Broad experience with research in field
Knowledge of the literature at hand
Access to some funding (specific to universities)
Methodological expertise & software
Research infrastructure, including personnel (such as graduate students)
Theoretical frameworks
Access to credibility
Ethics review process
Ability to affect policy change


Critical Questions that a community member SHOULD ask before CONSIDERING involvement in a CBPR project:
  • What are the goals of the project? Who benefits? Is this a priority for us? Is it tokenistic?
  • What are everyone's goals and responsibilities?
  • How will decisions be made and navigated? Who has final say? Who has control of the funds?
  • Who will collect the data? Who will have access to the data? How will privacy and confidentiality be managed?
  • What training or support do we need to make this happen?
  • How will we make sure that this partnership stays healthy? Can we check-in?
  • Can we produce a Terms of Reference Contract?
  • Can we set up an advisory committee consisting of community members and stakeholders to help oversee this project?
  • Will community members be hired to implement this project?
  • How will the results of the project be disseminated? Can we be creative in this process?




CBPR is a collaborative approach to research that equitably involves all partners in the research process and recognizes the unique strengths that each brings.




Terms of Reference Contract:

Before you dive into any campus-community research partnership, you should ensure that both parties have a clear understanding of the expected roles, responsibilities, project objectives, timelines, and project vision. One way to ensure this transparency at the start of the project is to have a contract.

A Terms of Reference is a kind of 'memo of understanding' that you can use to guide the work of your CBPR project. It is a document that should be co-created with all of your project partners. Creating a Terms of Reference Contract, gives your team an opportunity to ask: What does Community-Based Research mean to us? Why are we working together? What principles are underlying our partnership? How will we work together? Your Terms of Reference Contract should be something that each partner signs on to - but it should also be considered "a living document" - one that you can come back to and revisit throughout the life of your project. (Toronto Wellesley Institute)

The OCAP Example...

OCAP stands for Ownership, Control, Access, and Possession and it was sanctioned by the First Nations Information Governance Committee in 1998 to ensure self-determination over all research concerning First Nations communities:

[OCAP] is a way to say 'yes' to beneficial research and 'no' to research that may result in harm. (National Aboriginal Health Organization, 2007, 9)





Resources:

Reports:

Diaspora Engagement in Peace-Building and Development in Home and Host Countries. Toolkit for Community-Based Research (CBR) Practitioners. (2007). Toronto: Walter and Duncan Gordon Foundation http://www.gordonfn.org/GC_diaspora-resources.cfm

First Nations Centre. (2007). OCAP: Ownership, Control, Access, and Possession. Sanctioned by the First Nations Information Governance Committee. Assembly of First Nations: Ottawa: National Aboriginal Health Organization www.naho.ca/firstnations/english/documents/FNC-OCAP_001.pdf

Flicker, Sarah & Savan, Beth. (2006). A Snapshot of CBR in Canada. Toronto: Wellesley Institute http://depts.washington.edu/ccph/pdf_files/CBR%20snapshot%20report%20final.pdf

Flicker, S., Flynn, S., Larkin, J., Travers, R., Guta, A., Pole, J., & Layne, C. (2009). Sexpress: The Toronto Teen Survey Report. Toronto: Planned Parenthood Toronto http://www.ppt.on.ca/pdf/reports/TTS_report.pdf

Israel, B.A., Schulz, A.J., Parker, E., Becker, A.B. (1998). Review of Community-Based Research: Accessing Partnership Approaches to Improve Public Health. Annual Review of Public Health, 19, 173-202 http://depts.washington.edu/ccph/pdf_files/annurev.publhealth.19.1.pdf

Nelson, G., Ochocoka, J., Lord, J. (1998). Nothing about me, without me: Participatory action research with self-help/mutual aid organizations for psychiatric consumer/survivors. American Journal of Community Psychology, 26(6), 881-912 http://info.wlu.ca/~wwwpsych/gnelson/nothing%20about%20me%20without%20me%201998.pdf





Based Participatory Research Practitioners. New York: Hunter College Centre on AIDS, Drugs and Community Health lhttp://depts.washington.edu/ccph/pdf_files/ritas.pdf

Sample Terms of Reference Contract. Toronto: Wellesley Institute http://depts.washington.edu/ccph/pdf_files/MOU6.pdf

Websites:

Community-Campus Partnerships for Health. (2009) http://depts.washington.edu/ccph

Community Health Scholars Program. (2009) http://www.kellogghealthscholars.org/about/community.cfm

Community Research Canada. (2009) http://www.communityresearchcanada.ca

Examining Community-Institutional Partnerships for Prevention Research Group. Developing and Sustaining Community-Based Participatory Research Partnerships: A Skill-Building Curriculum lwww.cbprcurriculum.infowww.cbprcurriculum.info

Toronto Community Based Research Network. (2009) http://torontocbr.ning.com

Books:

Minkler, M. (1999). Community Organizing and Community Building for Health. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.





Minkler, M., & Wallerstein, N. (2003). Community Based Participatory Research for Health San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass

Peter, P., Brydon-Miller, M., Hall, B., Jackson, T. (1993). Voices of Change: Participatory Research in the United States and Canada Westport, Conneticut London: Bergin & Garvey

Stoecker, R. (2005). Research Methods for Community Change: A Project Based Approach London, UK: Sage

Sources of Funding/Resources:

Research Impact-Knowledge Mobilization Project -York University. (2009). I am seeking expertise or research findings http://www.researchimpact.ca/home/findings/index.htm

Wellesley Institute. (2007). Grants http://wellesleyinstitute.com/research/grants

Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR). (2009). Funding Opportunity Details http://www.researchnet-recherchenet.ca/rnr16/vwOpprtntyDtls.do?prog=714&&view=currentOpps&org=CIHR&type=AND&resultCount=25&sort=program&all=1&masterList=true

Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Ontario. (2009). Apply for funding - Community & Not-for-profit organizations http://www.sshrc-crsh.gc.ca/site/apply-demande/organizations-organismes-eng.aspx

Atkinson Foundation. What we fund. Retrieved December 2009 from: http://www.atkinsonfoundation.ca/what_we_fund?PROGRAM_ID=11